Skip to the main content.

3 min read

Beyond Storage: Why CISOs Are Rethinking Attachment Archiving

Beyond Storage: Why CISOs Are Rethinking Attachment Archiving

The Vulnerability in Your File Share

When a breach occurs, everyone scrutinizes firewalls, identity systems, and credentials. Rarely do they ask: What about the attachments you forgot existed? Yet unmanaged attachments can be one of the weakest links in your risk landscape. 

Consider this: in a 2025 survey of over 2,000 cybersecurity executives, 73% of Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) reported that security incidents were caused by unknown or unmanaged assets resources that simply weren’t visible or controlled. Unseen liabilities like attachments are increasingly exploited by adversaries, especially as hybrid systems and shadow IT grow more complex. 

For CISOs, the problem isn’t only the storage footprint itself (though that’s painful). The real threat is what those attachments conceal: compliance gaps, blind spots in audit trails, orphaned drafts, and fragmented data islands that undermine your ability to act with confidence. 

 

A Scenario Security Leadership Knows All Too Well

You’re the CISO of a global industrial firm. Recently, your organization faced a targeted penetration test which revealed suspicious behavior tied to a third-party vendor. Now, during a regulatory audit, you’re asked: 

  • Provide all contract change logs tied to a supplier over the last five years.
  • Include incident attachments tied to any security review or noncompliance during that period.

Your team scrambles: some attachments sit in ServiceNow’s sys_attachment_doc, others were moved to FileNet years ago, and early drafts rest in shadow file shares. Worse, your ERP-migration effort last quarter created uncontrolled duplicates. 

A request that should be a few days’ work drags into weeks. Meanwhile, you realize that you’ve lost the capabilities to ask strategic questions:

  • How did contract terms evolve over time?
  • Are there patterns in negotiation that correlate with supplier risk?
  • Which incidents exposed sensitive attachments, and who had access?

These aren’t just compliance questions. For the CISO, they’re risk, visibility, and strategy questions. And unmanaged attachments have left you flying blind. 

 

Why Legacy Approaches to Archiving Fail 

Many organizations default to simplistic archiving rules – purge large files, delete drafts, or restrict uploads. Those approaches come with significant downsides:

  • Loss of Intelligence: Early drafts, change logs, and intermediate versions often hide signals about process inefficiencies, negotiation patterns, or anomalous events.

  • Retention Mismatches: Without business-rule-driven retention, you risk noncompliance with legal or industry mandates.

  • Swivel-Chair Inefficiency: Archived attachments in one system often become inaccessible from others, forcing users to jump between platforms.
  • Increased Migration Risk: Chaos compounds Chaos compounds during migrations or system consolidations—attachments get lost, duplicated, or mislinked.

A purely technical "store-and-forget" archive strategy leaves security and governance out of the equation.

 

Discover How to Get the Most Out of Your ServiceNow Investment! 

 

Genus Attachment Archiver

The Genus team of ServiceNow experts designed the Genus Attachment Archiver to close the gap between storage optimization and governance, making your attachments part of a robust security and compliance fabric.

 

Business-Rule-Driven Archiving

Genus Attachment Archiver enables archiving decisions based on business logic, not simply file size or age:

  • Archive incident attachments only if they meet defined risk criteria (e.g., tied to critical business capabilities).
  • Logically isolate all attachments tied to a particular security group using business rules within a business unit.
  • Automatically apply legally mandated retention labels.
  • Automatically delete attachments at the end of required retention periods.

Because archiving is driven by business contexts, not rigid metadata, it aligns with how CISOs think about risk and visibility. 

 

Cross-System Integration & Accessibility

Attachments aren’t “lost” when archived; they’re made accessible via shared URIs (so multiple systems can point to the same archived file without duplication). ServiceNow, ERP, or other systems all point to the same location. This eliminates fragmentation and ensures users still access the data, minus the “swivel chair” inefficiency.

 

Audit & Governance Transparency

Built-in dashboards, audit logs, and analytics give CISOs full visibility: what was archived, when, and why. You can prove governance decisions to auditors, regulators, and boards.

 

Safe Migration Support

Migrations, especially ServiceNow upgrades, are rife with attachment sprawl. Paired with the Genus Migration Framework, Genus Attachment Archiver ensures attachments move once and correctly, preserving link continuity across systems. That mitigates risk, cost overruns, and post-migration surprises.

 

From Cost Control to Strategic Security Enablement

With the right attachment architecture, you unlock benefits far beyond storage savings: And yes, you’ll avoid the steep overage fees ServiceNow charges beyond its 4 TB allowance, costs that can reach thousands per month, while improving performance and upgrade speed.

  • Reduced Blast Radius: You can isolate sensitive attachments by business rules, limiting exposure in a breach.
  • Compliance Assurance: Automatically enforce retention and disposition policies to stay audit-ready. 
  • Recover Business Insights: Maintain end-to-end contract histories, negotiation drafts, and incident attachments (data usable for AI and process optimization).
  • AI-Ready Governance: As organizations deploy AI for risk analytics and contract intelligence, archived attachments remain part of the searchable, governed data set.

 

Setting the Future-Facing CISO Vision

Today, leaders are tempted to view attachments as a nuisance, a cost to cut. But the real opportunity is to treat them as a strategic asset: secure, integrated, governed, and AI-ready. 

CISOs who adopt this mindset will not just reduce risk — they’ll gain clarity, speed, and insight. They’ll be able to answer “What changed across 500 contracts this year — and why?” or “Which attachments relate to the security incident in Unit X?” 

Security leadership in the coming decade won’t just be about defending systems – it will be about enabling trusted, governed access to every piece of information. Genus Attachment Archiver can help give CISOs that capability.

 

If you would like to see Genus Attachment Archiver in action, contact me – Let's walk through a demo together!

  

Explore Genus Attachment Archiver

 

As a longtime ServiceNow Registered Partner, Genus Technologies is committed to providing our customers with insights into innovative technologies that drive efficiency, productivity, and success. Subscribe to the Genus blog so you don't miss an article.

Related Blogs and Insights

Hidden Costs of ServiceNow Attachments & How to Fix Them

Hidden Costs of ServiceNow Attachments & How to Fix Them

Overview ServiceNow includes 4 TB of storage per instance, but attachments in tables like sys_attachment_doc often push environments past that...

Low-Code Advantage: How ServiceNow is Transforming Workflow Automation

Low-Code Advantage: How ServiceNow is Transforming Workflow Automation

Digital Transformation is no longer a distant goal–it’s an urgent necessity. Enterprises, particularly within the Finance and Supply Chain sectors,...

Tech Health Checks – What You Need to Know

Tech Health Checks – What You Need to Know

As generative artificial intelligence (AI) and tech transformation rapidly reshape our cultural and professional landscape, organizations must...